While the NACE Standard TM0208 Vapor Inhibition Ability (VIA) test known also as VCI jar test is a powerful tool for rapid analysis of VCI packaging and chemistry, it isn’t always robust enough to evaluate the full protection of VCI packaging and is even more limited in its capabilities for testing things like sprayable greases, rust preventative oil, and other directly applied rust preventatives. For testing volatile corrosion inhibitors, and directly applied corrosion solutions we turn to our array of environmental testing chambers. Zerust® has 3 main flavors of environmental chambers for testing rust inhibiting coatings and packaging, high humidity, salt fog, and cycling temperature and humidity chambers.
Our environmental testing chambers allow us to do longer term and more in-depth studies on our products, as well as comparative studies. Because of the flexibility in the way that rust preventatives can be applied and the freedom to choose other metals to apply them to, we can test everything from Standard 1010 steel to aerospace grade metals in combinations with our products to find the best corrosion protection solutions for the customer. This flexibility also allows us to better simulate the customer’s unique packaging system. For example, a part can be treated in a specific machining fluid or fluids, in use by the customer, and then packaged in various VCI packages, and then placed in the appropriate chamber to test the efficacy of the packaging solution.
This method of testing does have its drawback, namely it is time consuming. The tests take hundreds of hours in chamber, and because the systems being tested are more complex, the test matrix tends to be much larger meaning that setting up the test is more complicated and time consuming. However, the test results from this testing are invaluable in that they approximate real world testing in an accelerated fashion that cannot be accomplished in more rapid test scenarios. It also tests the system more completely considering the barrier properties of polymer products and coatings, something that VCI testing does not accomplish.
Some examples for testing we do regularly in our humidity chambers is a “Salt Spritz” test. For this test, samples are sprayed with a methanol solution containing a known amount of sodium chloride (table salt). This allows us to put a controlled amount of corrosive material on the panels and tests our product’s ability to remove or neutralize the salt introduced into the system. This test is one of the most rapid tests that we can do in our humidity chambers, usually taking only 3 or 4 days from sample preparation, to test completion. This test however does rely on the product being tested having an ability to handle chloride contamination, something that not all corrosion inhibiting products have.
For samples that are not intended to have a neutralizing effect, we will often turn to our cycling environment chambers. These tests cycle between a higher humidity, lower temperature state, and relatively lower humidity, high temperature state, in accordance with the IEC 6068 standard. Cycling between high temperature, high humidity, and low temperature low humidity is best for replicating shipping conditions in which the packaging won’t be exposed to an outdoor environment, but may experience natural cycling of a day nigh temperature swing. We use this test in combination with salt spritz testing to confirm a more long-term protection, as well as an ability to neutralize salt contamination.
In almost all cases, this testing is conducted in a comparative way, with controls, both plain polyethylene film as well as know high performing films and competitor’s films. This sort of Horse race style testing gives us the best idea of where products line up within our own product ecosystem, as well as the greater corrosion protection ecosystem. One thing this testing cannot do is predict real world performance. We will often record hours to corrosion; however, this hour count is not useful for real world protection prediction.
The difficulty is in that our chambers are very well controlled systems. They use deionized water, and the temperature is very well controlled. They also tend to approximate a worst-case scenario. There are not many real-world situations where the packaging will be exposed to as much humidity as they are in our chambers. Similarly, when we purposely contaminate our panels with chloride, we are using pure sodium chloride. It is unlikely that any real work situation would have such “clean” contamination.
When the limitations of chamber testing are weighed against the advantages it is impossible to ignore the necessity of environmental chamber testing. The data collected from our various chambers is invaluable to our research and design process, and our technical service team. Chamber testing capability allows us to bring our customers top of the line products and service.